How Did Truth Become Subjective and Elevated Over Factuality?
The Impact of Misinformation on Society, Economy and Biodiversity.
Misinformation—the distortion or outright falsification of truth—has become a pervasive issue, influencing public discourse, decision-making, and trust. This phenomenon has profound consequences for society, the economy, and biodiversity.
The Role of Propaganda in Spreading Misinformation
Misinformation often finds its platform through influential voices. For example, in November 2024, Dame Judi Dench, a celebrated British actress, called on the UK government to ban trophy hunting imports after meeting South African campaigner Melanie Verwoerd. While well-intentioned, Dench appeared to rely on opinions from others without fully examining the broader context.
Verwoerd’s advocacy against trophy hunting has faced criticism, especially from Southern African community leaders. These community leaders have never see met her and believe that she has no right to decide over their wildlife management issues. Organizations like the Community Leaders Network of Southern Africa (CLN) argue that her stance does not reflect the needs of local communities, many of whom depend on regulated hunting for economic sustenance and conservation funding.
Critics highlight that such campaigns often harm the livelihoods of these communities by undermining well-regulated hunting programs that balance ecological sustainability with economic benefits.
Is Misinformation Profitable?
Propaganda—defined as the deliberate dissemination of information to influence public opinion—plays a key role in spreading misinformation. Originating from the Latin term propagare (“to propagate”), the term was first used in 1622 when Pope Gregory XV established a committee to promote Catholicism. Over time, the term has acquired negative connotations, particularly in political contexts.
Techniques used in propaganda include:
Selective Presentation: Highlighting certain facts while omitting others.
Emotional Appeals: Using emotionally charged language to sway opinions.
Repetition: Reinforcing messages through constant reiteration.
Loaded Language: Employing words with strong connotations to manipulate perceptions.
Modern propaganda leverages digital tools, including social media algorithms and bots, to amplify biased narratives.
The unethical use of propaganda in fundraising campaigns, such as those targeting anti-trophy hunting, often obscures the truth.
These campaigns manipulate public emotions, using selective facts and fabricated stories to solicit donations under the guise of “saving wildlife.”
The actual impact of such donations often remains unclear, leaving communities in conservation-dependent regions to bear the economic burden.
Social Media and the Loss of Critical Thinking
Public susceptibility to misinformation is compounded by a decline in critical thinking. Several factors contribute to this:
Cognitive Effort: Analyzing information deeply requires effort, leading many to favor simpler narratives.
Information Overload: The abundance of content encourages superficial reading over detailed analysis.
Over-reliance on Technology: Dependence on quick answers reduces independent problem-solving and critical evaluation.
Cognitive Biases: Confirmation bias leads individuals to favor information that aligns with pre-existing beliefs.
Lack of Intellectual Curiosity: A stagnant mindset discourages exploration of diverse perspectives.
Environmental Factors: An unsupported setting can further hinder intellectual engagement.

Asking for the Full Picture
The rise of misinformation, particularly around contentious issues like trophy hunting, underscores the need for critical thinking and evidence-based decision-making.
Public figures and campaigns should aim to present nuanced perspectives rather than simplistic narratives. By fostering intellectual curiosity and skepticism, society can counter the manipulation inherent in misinformation and ensure sustainable solutions for people, wildlife and the planet.

In summary, the debate and misinformation surrounding hunting and trophy hunting is intricate and often polarizing.
However, dismissing it entirely overlooks its contributions to conservation and sustainable development.
When conducted within a regulated and legal framework, trophy hunting can support wildlife preservation, enhance biodiversity, and deliver tangible benefits to local communities.
Adopting a balanced and informed viewpoint is crucial to developing conservation strategies that are both effective and equitable.
For a deeper understanding of the complexities of trophy hunting and its role in conservation, please follow SUCo-SA on the following platforms
SUCo-SA on Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn and YouTube.
Resources:-